ΕΝΙΣΧΥΣΤΕ το blog μας με ένα απλό "ΚΛΙΚ" στις διαφημίσεις

Τρίτη 6 Σεπτεμβρίου 2011

WIKILEAKS : Αλβανική “μπαμπεσιά” με την οριοθέτηση των θαλασσίων συνόρων Αλβανίας-Ελλάδας



"Μπαμπέσικα" φαίνεται ότι φέρθηκε η αλβανική κυβέρνηση στην ελληνική μετά την υπογραφή της συμφωνίας για την οριοθέτηση των θαλασσίων συνόρων το Απρίλιο του 2009


Όπως αναφέρεται στο τηλεγράφημα της αμερικανικής πρεσβείας στα Τίρανα με ημερομηνία 12 Φεβρουαρίου 2010 (REF: 2009 TIRANA 271), η απόρριψη της ελληνοαλβανικής Συμφωνίας από το Συνταγματικό Δικαστήριο της Αλβανίας με 9-0 ψήφους, θα πρέπει να "τορπιλίστηκε" κατόπιν οδηγίας του ιδίου πρωθυπουργού της χώρας Σαλί Μπερίσα, αφού όπως επισημαίνεται η θητεία ορισμένων από τους δικαστές που συμμετείχαν στο Συνταγματικό Δικαστήριο, έληγε σύντομα και οι τελευταίοι δεν θα ήθελαν να χάσουν μία νέα ανανέωση της θητείας τους δυσαρεστώντας αυτόν που τους διορίζει, δηλαδή των πρωθυπουργό της χώρας (Another observer suggested that the Court had to have had the clearance from PM Sali BERISHA to make such a ruling since  the terms of a few judges on the court expire soon and they  would not want to jeopardize future appointments from the PM  by going against BERISHA's will). Την θέση αυτή φαίνεται να υιοθετεί αναλυτής ο οποίος την μετέφερε στην αμερικανική πρεσβεία. 


Όπως αναφέρει το τηλεγράφημα της πρεσβείας ένας άλλος έμπειρος Αλβανός νομικός που ζεί εκτός Αλβανίας ενημέρωσε την αμερικανική πρεσβεία ότι η ομόφωνη απόφαση του Συνταγματικού Δικαστηρίου της Αλβανίας είναι πρωτοφανής και αδύνατο να συμβεί εκτός εάν διαθέτει την σιωπηλή έγκριση της κυβέρνησης της Αλβανίας. 


Σύμφωνα με τον συντάκτη του τηλεγραφήματος η αλβανική κυβέρνηση οδηγήθηκε σε αυτή την κίνηση λόγω της πίεσης που δέχτηκε από την κοινή γνώμη, την αντιπολίτευση αλλά και τους στρατιωτικούς. Με την απόφαση του Συνταγματικού Δικαστηρίου η αλβανική κυβέρνηση ακύρωσε την υπογραφή της, χωρίς θεωρητικά να εκτεθεί στην ελληνική κυβέρνηση. 


Πάντως όπως αναφέρει ο Αμερικανός συντάκτης μετά την ακύρωση της συμφωνίας, οι σχέσεις των δύο χωρών γύρισαν πίσω στη σύνηθες κατάσταση, των εντάσεων και των πολύπλοκων προβλημάτων.
 
Τμήμα ειδήσεων defencenet.gr          

KEY 248607
ID 10TIRANA86
SUBJECT COURT NULLIFIES ALBANIAN-GREEK SEA AGREEMENT
DATE 2010-02-12 12:38:00
CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL
ORIGIN Embassy Tirana
TEXT C O N F I D E N T I A L TIRANA 000086
SIPDIS
C O R R E C T E D COPY TEXT
DEPT FOR EUR/SCE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/09/2019
TAGS: PREL, PGOV, AL
SUBJECT: COURT NULLIFIES ALBANIAN-GREEK SEA AGREEMENT
REF: 2009 TIRANA 271
Classified By: AMBASSADOR JOHN WITHERS FOR REASONS 1.4 (b) AND (d).
1. (C) Summary: On January 26, the Constitutional Court in a
9-0 opinion ruled that the April 2009 treaty between Greece
and Albania regarding the southern coastline was
unconstitutional. The opinion has not yet been released, but
the Court said in a statement that it found "substantive and
procedural" problems with the agreement. The 9-0 opinion was
surprising as things are rarely unanimous in Albania, and the
GOA had strongly and publicly defended the treaty when it
first came under public fire. A Greek diplomat said he was
"disappointed" in the ruling and suggested some "quid pro
quo" would be in the works as Albania still needs Greece for
many of the issues it is trying to tackle. End summary.
2. (C) On January 26, the Constitutional Court in a 9-0
opinion struck down Albania's April 2009 treaty with Greece
regarding the southern coast of Albania. The treaty, which
was signed last April in Tirana, came during the first visit
of a Greek PM to Albania since 1992, and was as praised by
the Greeks as it was panned by the Albanian media (reftel).
Nearly every day since the treaty was signed, left leaning
Gazeta Shqiptare published articles condemning the treaty,
labeling it as biased, unfair, illegal, and unconstitutional.
The opposition Socialist Party then asked the Constitutional
Court to review the treaty. The Constitutional Court, it
seems, agreed. However it has not published its reasoning
yet, saying only that "procedural and substantive" issues
were violated by the treaty. Most observers expect the
Court's opinion to be published next week.
3. (C) Dr. Albert Rekipi of the Albanian Institute for
Strategic Studies blamed the lack of GOA transparency for the
dim view of the treaty. Rekipi said the GOA tried to ram the
treaty through parliament and did not solicit support or
advice from the opposition on what he termed a "national
issue, Albania's land." He also questioned whether or not the
MFA even had the necessary experts to negotiate such a
treaty. Rekipi said the 9-0 ruling was extraordinary as the
court rarely rules unanimously on anything. The highly
unusual nature of the ruling has bred enormous speculation.
Another observer suggested that the Court had to have had the
clearance from PM Sali BERISHA to make such a ruling since
the terms of a few judges on the court expire soon and they
would not want to jeopardize future appointments from the PM
by going against BERISHA's will. One long-time expat legal
expert told PolOff that a 9-0 ruling by the court against the
treaty "is inconceivable" unless the court received at least
tacit approval by the GOA to reject the treaty. Grumblings
over the treaty have also been heard from the military.
Observers widely speculated that the treaty was a quid pro
quo for Greek support for NATO and the Stabilization and
Association Agreement (SAA).
4. (C) Ioannis Vikelidis of the Greek Embassy told poloff
that the Constitutional Court's decision was "disappointing,"
adding that, from his point of view, the Greeks reached a
binding agreement with Albania. However, Vikelidis said the
Greeks will respect the ruling of the Court. He said the
Albanian negotiators were the "cream of the crop" for Albania
with legal, maritime, and military experts on hand during the
negotiations and therefore if a new agreement must be
reached, the Greeks would likely insist on a new composition
of the Albanian side. He also vaguely suggested a "quid pro
quo" for Albania, remarking that Albania has many issues on
its plate that require Greek assent and/or assistance. He
also pointed out that the Albanian side has not ratified the
treaty concerning Greek cemeteries in Albania either, despite
having had plenty of time to do so. (NOTE: The cemeteries
would be for the remains of Greek soldiers killed in Albania
during WWII. END NOTE). He also lamented the role of the
media in the process, noting that it has fanned the flames of
discontent and reported irresponsibly on this matter. He too
expected the opinion to be released in a few weeks, ample
time he said, for some "cooking" of the opinion. He
questioned the precedent and example Albania is setting,
saying that it should honor its agreements. Former Greek
Foreign Minister Dora Bakoyannis, who was FM at the time of
the treaty negotiations, said publicly that the annulment of
the treaty was sought by "extremist" groups and said SP
leader Edi Rama joined those groups in opposing the treaty
and therefore bears some responsibility for this decision.
5. (C) Responding to the Court's decision, Deputy Prime
Minister and Foreign Minister Ilir Meta affirmed the
government's respect for the Court's decision, and the GOA's
intention to respond to the Court's arguments once the full
decision is released. Further clarification on the sea
borders with Greece and Montenegro remains a high priority
for the GOA as it is a step towards Albania's EU membership,
according to Meta. Meta also commented on the importance of
Greek-Albanian relations, saying Greece remains one of the
principal supporters of Albania's European integration and
visa liberalization processes. Meta also cited the almost 1
million Albanians who live in Greece, and Greece's "firm
support" for Albania,s NATO membership.
6. (C) Comment: Last spring it seemed the Greeks and
Albanians had ironed out all their differences. With the
visit of then-PM Karamanlis and the signing of the sea and
cemetery agreements, it seemed a new day had dawned. Ten
months later, with one agreement declared unconstitutional
and the other not ratified, the two sides appear to be back
where they where they were before, suspicious and untrusting
of one another, yet needing one another as well. The Court's
9-0 ruling is a rare show of harmony in this otherwise
rabidly partisan political environment. Numerous observers
have told Post that the GOA was caught off guard by the
public backlash against the treaty, and may have nudged the
Constitutional Court towards rejecting the treaty as a way of
limiting the domestic political damage, while at the same
time saving face with Greece. Vikelidis was clearly miffed
during the meeting and his tone was ominous as he pointed out
that Albania still needs Greece for many things it is trying
to achieve. How this will play out is uncertain right now,
but it seems that the Albanian-Greek relationship is back to
where it usually is: tense and complicated.
WITHERS
HEADER VZCZCXYZ0006
OO RUEHWEB
DE RUEHTI #0086/01 0431238
ZNY CCCCC ZZH (CCY AD220671 MSI9076-695)
O 121238Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY TIRANA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8816
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE IMMEDIATE 2555
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 3611


XTAGS: XTAGPREL, XTAGPGOV, XTAGAL
REF: 09TIRANA271

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου

Ευχαριστούμε, το μήνυμα σας μεταφέρεται άμεσα στους διαχειριστές μας.